Is a core-flex policy the answer to global mobility needs in 2017?
A phalanx of new reports suggests locally-focused and flexible mobility policies are increasingly the policy solution of choice for companies looking to best match employee and employer needs. Here, Lisa Johnson, global practice leader of Crown World Mobility's consulting services, outlines the advantages to a core-flex approach.
Could core-flex be the future?In the past, for many employees, the financial upside was an important motivating factor for an international move. There was an expectation that they would be able to bank a substantial amount of their assignment benefits. Today, expectations and budgets are different.Very few companies now offer a straight-up flexible policy, such as a lump sum that employees manage independently. Partly, this seems to be due to the number of programme elements that are deemed essential or compliance-related, and the concern that employees will not know the best way to accomplish certain tasks.When given the option to keep money rather than spend it, for instance, they may choose to keep money and find themselves at a disadvantage later. Examples of benefits that are likely to be undervalued upfront, but appreciated in hindsight, include:
Balancing the mobility approachIn the past, companies often had policies that assumed all assignees' and families’ needs were the same, regardless of location, assignment goals and family situation. This “one-size-fits-all” approach made planning and managing assignments simpler; it also made assignment support expensive and inflexible.So, is core-flex the ultimate answer? Well, there are some caveats to consider.For a start, it is not a given that introducing core-flex policies will save money, which is often one of the primary reasons for their introduction. In fact, if not implemented appropriately they could even prove more expensive.Second, it is a common misconception that core-flex simplifies policy administration. In reality, administration is typically more complex than for a strictly defined policy or suite of tiered policies. More choice means more complexity in development, roll-out and ongoing management. Budgeting can also be more challenging, since it may be harder to anticipate which flex options will apply to various assignments.
Pros and cons of core-flex mobility policiesFor businesses considering a core-flex approach, here are the pros and cons:Pros:
- fewer requests for exceptions
- employee can manage move on their own terms
- employee can benefit from cash not spent
- employee typically receives more assistance than they would with a standard policy approach
- can be more costly to the employee who “runs out of money”
- the employee carries more of the administrative burden
- company spends more than necessary if the employee can keep cash
- increased cost of flexible policy can make management of it complex.